Skip to main content
Grid Lines

Snapshot 1

Concerns, Precautions, and Impact on Voting Turnout

How safe did voters expect to feel, what did they do to prepare, and did they turn out to vote?

In the lead-up to the 2024 election, most voters anticipated a safe experience at the polls. Yet, for many of our respondents fears of violence ran deeper, and this impacted how they planned to vote and whether they actually voted.

Dive into safety concerns and how they influenced voter behavior, from changing voting plans to taking precautionary measures—an added burden disproportionately shouldered by those already marginalized. Explore what public officials—state legislators, law enforcement, election officials, and election workers—thought about the safety risks faced by various groups of voters.

Perceived Safety

Most Voters Feel Safe–But Some Gaps Remain

Most voters across the country headed to the polls in 2024 feeling confident in their safety, including women and gender-nonconforming voters. Despite an increased climate of political hostility in the United States, the majority reported feeling mostly or completely safe casting their ballots—a reassuring sign that, for many, the democratic process remains secure.

Yet, beneath this surface, disparities persist. Women, gender-nonconforming individuals, and racially marginalized voters were more likely to carry heightened concerns about their safety. These concerns impacted if and how people from these marginalized groups actually turned out to vote.

77%

of voters felt safe leading up to the 2024 election.

Grid Lines
Americans’ perceptions of personal safety while voting, pre-election

View chart by

Completely or mostly safe

Neither

Completely or mostly unsafe

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Women

73%

21%

5%

Men

81%

15%

4%

Gender-nonconforming

70%

29%

1%

Explore safety perceptions in the

Data Playground

How do we define election-related violence and harassment?

In our focus groups, we defined “political violence” as “the use of violence, threats, intimidation, or harassment with the goal of preventing or discouraging others from exercising their full social or political rights, and/or advancing one’s own political aims.”

In our survey of state legislators, we defined “political violence” as “any threats, intimidation, harassment, or attacks intended to prevent or discourage others from exercising their political rights.”

In other surveys, we asked questions about five specific types of incidents, encompassing both physical violence and other forms of intimidation:

1

Being harassed, threatened, or intimidated verbally or in writing

2

Having personal or derogatory information published online

3

Having property destroyed or defaced

4

Being pushed, blocked, or hurt physically in a non-serious way

5

Being beaten up, attacked with a weapon, or otherwise seriously injured or killed

On this site, we refer to acts of violence as distinct from harassment, threats, and other behavior meant to intimidate voters or make them feel unsafe.

Grid Lines

A Threatening Culture

For Many Voters, the Threat Goes Beyond the Ballot Box

I

feel

like

physically,

the

physical

aggression

is

the

most

harmful,

but

just

from

my

experience

personally,

I’ve

had

the

most

issues

with

just

verbal

intimidation

— Black Democratic woman voter

I

also

think

that

as

far

as

to

women,

there’s

definitely,

it’s

ripe

this

season

for

harassing

women

because

there’s

a

lot

at

stake

for

women….

So,

I

do

think

that

anything

can

happen.

I

think

there’s

crazy

people

out

there.

I

do

think

that

if

Trump

doesn’t

win,

there’s

going

to

be

violence

for

sure.

— White Republican woman voter

At

the

voting

station

people

were

driving

monster

trucks,

revving

engines

with

gigantic

flags.

It’s

scary.

— White Democratic woman voter

I’ve

experienced

harassment

on

social

media

where

people

say

things

like,

‘If

you

believe

this

you’re

a

moron

and

you

should

be

ashamed.

— White Democratic woman voter

Even when the physical act of voting remains largely safe, many voters—especially women, people of color, and gender-nonconforming individuals—feel threatened by the broader political climate of polarization, harassment, and online toxicity.

These feelings of unease extend beyond polling places. Many voters reported being unwilling to discuss their voting plans and choices publicly or on social media.

Grid Lines

Women were least willing to discuss their voting choices openly with others.

Americans’ willingness to talk openly about voting plans and choices with each group, pre-election

Women

Men

Gender-nonconforming

Completely unwilling

1

2

3

4

Completely willing

5

Family and Friends

3.7

3.8

3.7

Neighbors and Coworkers

2.9

3.3

3.1

Social media

2.6

3.0

3.2

Others at polling place

2.4

2.7

2.4

Strangers

2.3

2.6

2.3

Explore willingness to discuss voting choices in the

Data Playground
Grid Lines

Expectations of Violence

Anticipating Violence: A Silent Burden on Marginalized Voters

While most voters expected to be safe during the 2024 election, concerns and expectations about violence or harassment were shouldered by marginalized groups.

Women voters felt worse than men did when thinking about potential violence or harassment during the election—including being afraid, upset, sad, angry, intimidated, and disgusted. Voters of color had higher expectations of personally experiencing violence or harassment than white voters, and gender-nonconforming voters had higher expectations than either men or women.

In general, Americans were aware of the groups that shouldered more concerns and risk. They correctly estimated that violence and threats during the voting process would be more of a problem for voters of color and gender-nonconforming voters, but overall not particularly high for any group.

State legislators, law enforcement, election officials, and election workers’ perceptions mirrored voters’ perceptions. They expected most voters to be safe, but anticipated marginalized groups to be more likely to encounter violence or harassment during the voting process.

Gender-nonconforming voters felt the most negatively about potentially experiencing violence while voting.

Grid Lines
Americans’ strength of negative emotions about potential election-related violence, pre-election

View chart by

Not at all

1

2

3

4

Extremely

5

Women

2.5

Men

2.3

Gender-nonconforming

2.8

Explore voter’s emotions about violence in the

Data Playground

Verbal harassment or threats were the most expected types of election violence by voters.

Grid Lines
Expected likelihood of voters experiencing each type of incident while voting, pre-election
General Population

Very unlikely

1

2

3

4

Very likely

5

Verbal harassment or threats

2.0

Personal info online

1.9

Property destroyed/damaged

1.9

Non-serious physical violence

1.9

Serious physical violence

1.7

Explore voter's expected experiences in the

Data Playground

Voters viewed gender-nonconforming and non-white voters as having the highest risk of violence.

Grid Lines
Expectations that election-related violence would be a problem for each group, pre-election
General Population

Not a problem at all

1

2

3

4

Very serious problem

5

Women

2.0

Men

1.8

Gender-nonconforming

2.3

White

1.8

People of color

2.2

Democrats

2.1

Independents

1.8

Republicans

2.0

Explore perceptions of violence risk in the

Data Playground
Grid Lines

Changes to Voting Plans and Turnout

Voting with Caution: How Safety Concerns Shape Voting Behavior

I

go

early,

or

late,

when

I

won’t

run

into

anybody

I

know,

and

there

won’t

be

any

conversation.

I

don’t

want

to

deal

with

the

emotional,

‘Who

did

you

vote

for?’

And

me

saying,

‘I

don’t

want

to

discuss

it.’

— Black Republican woman

I

just

feel

more

comfortable

doing

mail-in

voting,

because

there

have

been

so

many

upticks

of

gun

violence

in

the

last

few

years.

And

even

being

in

a

state

where

it’s

highly

regulated,

the

thought

of

just

going

anywhere

with

large

crowds

where

there

could

be

any

political

tension

freaks

me

out.

— White Independent woman

I

don’t

go

to

the

polls,

because

you

never

know

what

you

will

encounter

there.

It

seems

like

everybody

in

Arizona

has

a

gun….

We

vote

by

mail,

because

it’s

safer.

— White Independent woman

I’m

worried

about

how

people

will

perceive

me.

I

feel

anxiety.

I

go

in

the

morning

because

there’s

no

one

around.

In

the

afternoon,

evening,

that’s

when

you’ll

get

people

trying

to

persuade

you.

I

keep

to

myself….

I

leave

as

efficiently

as

I

can.

— White Gender-nonconforming Democratic voter

Concerns and expectations about violence or harassment while voting actively shape how some voters approach election day. Women, gender-nonconforming individuals, and voters of color often find themselves adjusting their voting behavior to feel safer at the polls. This reality places an added burden on communities that already face systemic barriers to participation.

The data reveals a clear connection: those who expect violence or feel more negatively about the voting environment are more likely to take safety precautions while voting and less likely to actually turn out and vote. Even accounting for differences in turnout based on standard demographic variables, increased expectations of experiencing violence or harassment while voting still led to significantly lower voter turnout.

Differences in voter behavior based on education level (one of the strongest predictors of turnout) are only half as large as the differences based on expectations of violence or harassment. Generalizing from our model, roughly 6 million Americans may have decided not to vote in 2024 because of concerns about violence or harassment.

Each step up on the scale of expectations of violence showed an average of 6% fewer people voting.

Grid Lines
Share of Americans who turned out to vote based on pre-election expectations of election-related violence

Voted

Did not vote

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Those who felt violence was very likely

61%

39%

Those who felt violence was somewhat likely

74%

26%

Those who felt violence was neither likely nor unlikely

71%

29%

Those who felt violence was somewhat unlikely

80%

20%

Those who felt violence was very unlikely

85%

15%

Explore survey respondents' turnout in the

Data Playground

Voters who expected violence were more likely to plan to take safety precautions.

Grid Lines
Share of Americans intending to take safety precautions based on expectations of election-related violence, pre-election

Likely

Neutral

Unlikely

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Those expecting violence

44%

40%

16%

Those who felt neutral

27%

53%

19%

Those not expecting violence

16%

31%

54%

Explore safety measures in the

Data Playground

The most commonly-planned safety precautions included not bringing children to vote, avoiding interacting with others at polling places, and going with others to vote.

Grid Lines
Americans’ intentions to take each safety precaution, pre-election
All Americans

Very unlikely

1

2

3

4

Very likely

5

Not interacting

2.7

Voting with others

2.5

Not bringing children

2.8

Dressing differently

2.0

Voting by mail

2.3

Voting at a specific time

2.4

Not voting

1.8

Explore safety measures in the

Data Playground
Grid Lines

Data Playground

Explore the Data Around Voter Expectations, Fears, and Precautions

Voters
Pre-election: Personal feelings of safety while voting

View mode

All Americans

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Completely unsafe

2%

Mostly unsafe

3%

Neither safe nor unsafe

19%

Mostly safe

34%

Completely safe

43%

Grid Lines

See what marginalized voters actually experienced during the election in

Snapshot 2